My Reflections on the Policy and Advocacy Lab
What comes into your mind when you hear the term advocacy? In my case, whenever I explain my work to people, they always ask if I am now a politician. I have come to realise that most people associate advocacy with politics. Then again, everything is political. Prior to joining SIVIO Institute, I envisioned advocacy as something to do with high profile individuals sharing petitions online, activists staging demonstrations outside government buildings and media sharing their stories. In retrospect, my thinking was influenced by the fact that these are the most visible actions at policy engagement. However, this is barely a representation of everyday individuals who take part in policy advocacy on various platforms without cameras in their face.
At SIVIO Institute I am responsible for coordinating the Policy and Advocacy Lab. As someone who was coming from a Community Nutrition background, I struggled to comprehend how my experience would fit in the grand scheme of the advocacy lab. Of course, I have been involved in policy and advocacy before. My advocacy has always been “issue” specific with a particular focus on marginalised groups such as women. I have engaged different stakeholders at community level and on social media to raise awareness on issues affecting women. Even my MSc dissertation focused on maternal health service delivery for marginalised religious women. Interestingly, at this stage I barely understood that what I was doing was actually advocacy; probably just an issue of semantics. Joining SIVIO Institute improved my advocacy and I began to understand the concept behind what I was doing all along. Since joining the organisation, I have had the privilege of working with 15 advocacy practitioners from other organisations spread across the country. It has been an eye-opening experience on how we can bring citizens’ voices back into the policy making space.
So, what exactly is the Policy and Advocacy Lab?
When was the last time you were engaged on a problem that was affecting your community? The question sounds so simple but for most people the realisation is that they never participate in any policy formulation processes. In the most recent report by SIVIO Institute on Citizen’s Perceptions and Expectations carried out across Zimbabwe, 60.18% of the survey respondents indicated that they have never been involved in policy formulation process, whilst 39.82% confirmed that they have been a part of some consultation process, mostly around the performance of local government and consultations for improved service delivery[1]. It is not surprising that in Zimbabwe, there is usually a top-down approach in policy formulation, assessment and refinement. Citizens have been left out in conversations for too long. Studies have shown that policies have a better chance of success if we include the voices of the people, but this is not the case in our country, the process has mainly been expert driven and monopolised by technocrats. Economic policy reforms have not adequately created socio-economic benefits for the general population. Coupled by government failure to meet its promises, there is a high level of mistrust and discontent from citizens. The Lab’s premise is that in order for policy to be successful there is need for platforms where citizens are included and actively engaged in the policy processes.
The Policy and Advocacy Lab (PAL) is one such platform where professionals from different walks of life ranging from the humanities, biology, engineering, commerce, law and development work; who are not policy makers, but instead are involved in advocacy and interact with communities as policy advocates. The participants in the Lab are using a collaborative creative space https://sccs.sivioinstitute.org/ to try and tackle complex challenges in the formulation and implementation of government policy. We have also infused deliberative democracy practices in ensuring that the lab does not produce another cohort of top-down experts but rather collegial community leaders who recognise that communities have ideas and also assets to resolve some of their problems. The main idea is to improve advocacy actions by nurturing collaborative arrangements with communities. These collaborative spaces contribute towards jointly identifying policy problems, new research methods that engage citizens as active agents on the gaps in existing policy and provide comprehensive advocacy solutions. The interactive nature of the PAL allows individuals to connect with the communities to identify the root cause of policy problems. Often, experts hardly engage with people at grassroots level. While everyone cannot come to be a part of all policy discussions and all problems cannot be effectively addressed overnight via consultancy, it is important to think of the voices being left out.
What have we been doing?
The Advocacy Lab is an 8-stage process.
Naming the problem.
This stage includes the identification of the problem behind the problem which we call naming the problem. The naming process is very political. Usually experts would give technical names to problems that alienate others who are not steeped in the discipline of language being used. Citizens on the other hand tend to use everyday language to name what they think is the problem. Furthermore, if the problem is inadequately named it may lead to the wrong solution or even alienating actors who would have been critical in resolving the problem. We asked participants in the lab to jointly name a problem with members of communities where they work. Given the lock-down conditions many of the lab participants leveraged technology to host town hall like meetings.
One interesting aspect of this stage is that it is an on-going process. As the lab progresses, participants always refer back to this stage and ensure they have named the problem and not the symptom of the problem.
Mapping stakeholders and gathering concerns
We aimed to develop an understanding of individuals or groups of people affected by the policy problem and the extent to which they are affected. This was an important stage because we understood the need to keep citizens at the centre. We engaged stakeholders affected by the problem through mapping of affected communities and listing concerns regarding the problem. It was at this stage that we considered the possible policy actions and potential trade-offs required. We also sought to understand the extent of the problem. Is it unique to one community (or social group)? Critical questions used include; (i)Who else is affected by the problem, (ii) is this a national problem or its only isolated to a certain region, and (iii) who has the authority to resolve the problem (local or national government)?
Learning about the history of the identified problem
In many instances, policy practitioners (advocate and even policy formulators) rarely consider the history of the problem. Together with the lab participants we developed rapid appraisals to understand the history of the problem and the different measures (including policy) that have been deployed to resolve the problem. It was also at this stage where we sought to understand the agency within communities to effectively address some of the problems.
Exploring existing measures to tackle the problem
We take cognisance of the fact that we are not dealing with a brand-new problem. Its impacts may have accentuated. Again, we went back into communities and asked the following; (i) what has been done about the problem to date, (ii) what have communities done in responses to the problem, (iii) what have been some of the lessons from the previous attempts?
Learning from others in the region,
Whilst some problems are unique and localized, the majority of the problems that we confront such as climate change, dealing with pandemics, and corruption are quite common in other countries as well. The lab participants managed to carry out research on other countries to identify what worked well and what did not.
Framing possible policy actions,
The challenge of policy advocacy goes beyond poking holes at an existing policy but instead to devote significant attention in designing well thought out coherent policy actions. These should be informed by the lessons and evidence from the preceding stages. At this stage, communities understand the name of the problem and the lab participants engaged them to start thinking about possible policy actions while also considering the advantages and disadvantages of each. These conversations have resulted in creating frameworks for addressing the problem including actions that need to be considered in dealing with the problem and identifies adverse consequences.
Identifying the best possible methods of communicating new policy ideas problems
The work of policy advocacy has to delicately balance persuasion and confrontation where necessary. Participants in the Lab are currently on this stage and with the information collected during the first 6 stages, we are starting to plan for advocacy.
Carrying out concerted advocacy actions
We will be working alongside lab participants in rolling their ‘concerted advocacy actions’. It’s not a big bang but we are just laying the seeds for a new movement of community focused policy advocacy
[1] https://www.sivioinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Citizens-Perception-and-Expectation-Report.pdf
On Complacency, Being Complicit, Courage and Confidence Part One: Complacency
I Still Struggle
I have since 2009 been blessed with a job which entails a lot of travelling all over Africa and other parts of the world, but I still struggle with travel. No not about turbulence, none of that, I struggle with the idea of leaving my family behind even if it’s for a week- sound spoilt right. For years I thought I would come to a day where I am comfortable with the idea of leaving my family behind, but it hit me today that such a day would change me for the worst. Why I should be comfortable with leaving the family behind? My family is all that I have, all that I labour for and that I cling to- so how can one even entertain the idea of being comfortable with the idea of leaving loved ones behind? Alas, wretched man that I am I will have to contend with the struggle and use the struggle as a measurement yardstick of how I am still connected to that which matters the most.
I have other struggles too and hopefully in 2015 I will be able to put these to rest or will find a way of co-existing with them. I was born at a time when Africa had almost decolonized except for my beloved Zimbabwe, Namibia and South Africa but still was raised to value the struggle for liberation. I have always believed that had I been born earlier I would have without a doubt joined the struggle for the liberation of Zimbabwe. But lately I struggle with the idea and purpose of liberation, especially when I observe what our so-called liberators are doing or have done. What was the purpose of liberation- to create a more equal and free society? Let me be clear from the beginning colonialism and apartheid were evil systems that we should not even try to justify. BUT I still struggle with how we have cheapened the idea of our own liberation and at most reduced it to slogans to an extent that others even question if it was worth it. I believe it was worth it but it’s up to the liberators to live up to the ideals of that struggle so that others can also see themselves as a part of the freedom. There is so much more to freedom.
I was also born into a family with a history in political activism, two of my uncles fought in the liberation struggle and my father (may his soul rest in peace) was a passionate activist for workers’ rights. Intellectually I was raised by two radical leftist scholars and I basically ate everything they dished at me. I was taught to look at society through the lens of class and the world through centre-periphery relations- imperialism and also that the West (capitalist) is inherently pursuing an agenda of exploiting the periphery (underdeveloped regions of the world including Africa). I still believe that. However I struggle with the fact that these ideas surely are not sacrosanct- how can we talk of a working class in a region where more than 50% of are unemployed? How about other richer forms of identity- ethnic, religious, demography and geography? Do we the people of Africa see ourselves just as workers and employers? Secondly, whilst I continue to subscribe and utilize the centre-periphery framework of analysis I struggle with its limitations. How do we account for China and India, the behavior of our own political elites and even the emerging business class in contributing to the mess we find ourselves in? Here in Zimbabwe the centre-periphery framework (read- sanctions) although real has fallen into the trap of exhausted denialism on the part of political elites- everything that has gone wrong in our country is due to sanctions imposed on us by the West! Really. How about sheer ineptitude, lack of capacity and also pure greed. I must admit the discourse is beginning to shift to putting the blame on institutional weaknesses and abuse of office by those in senior positions of decision making. I still struggle with the extent to which we will take responsibility for our own continent and move it forward. Since slavery things just get done to us when we will do things to others?
I struggle with the idea that free markets (read Foreign Direct Investment) are the panacea to Africa’s underdevelopment. Recently Zambia increased mining royalties to 20% and every so-called analyst raised the fear that this will dampen investment. But they do not talk about the purpose of that investment and how Zambia has benefitted or not from previous cycles of FDI. Equally I struggle with the idea of state based economic planning and intervention through public enterprises. Almost every public enterprise has issues. I think the division between the free market and state based economic planning/intervention is a false one- it creates the impression that the two cannot co-exist. My real struggle is how come we are not debating these issues any more we have made these institutional arrangements seem as if they are natural. They are man-made for heaven’s sake and for all we know they could have reached their sell by date and we need new ideas for organizing our economies!
Now allow me to be controversial… I struggle with democracy. Please do not shut me out as yet. I struggle with the limitations we have imposed on democracy. We have erroneously reduced it to a formulaic prescription of reforming the constitution and introducing a system of regular elections. The latest invention- where there is a dispute-encourage a power sharing arrangement! That is good but that is not all. Such an approach to democracy has led to narrow institutionalism without an organic evolution of democracy from the bottom. The ‘democracy is equal to elections’ mantra has been exported to most of Africa with mixed consequences for governance, economic development and the manner in which political power is exercised within the polity. In many ways it has led to an elite based and unaccountable dynastic form of politics strengthened by clientelist relations which fuel corruption and entrench inequality.
Democracy promises so much more than we have- we literally shape it for our own context -it’s time to flip the social and political order. The rot in our politics and economic systems does not require new laws, institutions or expectations of messianic politicians who will be duty bound to serve. No. We need active and empowered citizens with the capacity to engage those in power and speak truth to them. Only then will our politicians understand that a town-hall meeting is not for them to engage in grandiose political posturing but instead for listening and understanding the concerns of the citizens. Only and until we reclaim power for citizens will we have real democracy here in Africa and indeed in the world. We are the ones we have been waiting for.
Well I can go on with my struggles and might even overwhelm you- there is hope though. Let me share some bright spots.
With regards to travel- it’s inevitable- but distance makes the heart fonder and we learn not to take loved ones for granted. But we can also limit travel and take advantage of technology. For instance I intend to have more skype based meetings and even virtual participation in workshops this year rather than travelling for close to da day to make a 15min presentation!
I also strongly believe that there is hope for Africa. The fact that we are having this discussion means that there is a core amongst us not happy with the mediocre results we are churning out in our societies. We can do better. The incessant power cuts, water shortages and craters (potholes) in our roads only serve to make us stronger. I am fully convinced that we need to change the power equation- sovereignty does not lie in the leader but in us the people- I am not calling for another Arab Spring (and also not Burkina Faso) but instead a much more coherent patient building from the bottom up of citizen based democracy. We need to build our own democratic systems within our communities where we live and in the process reinstall a sense of dignity amongst our people who have otherwise been battered by poverty and shameless dictatorship that rule and squander in the name of the people.
So where do we start- you may ask? One thing for sure all of us are associational creatures- one of my mothers (don’t worry I am an African we call our aunties mothers as well) belongs to more than four associations serving different needs including spiritual (church), financial wellbeing (rotating savings), welfare and support in times of family bereavement. Why don’t we start here by empowering what already exists and create a new democratic movement of the people by the people. We are tired of being told what we as a people need, in 2015 we will being a process of ensuring that we tell them what we need and that those in political office take orders from us.
Finally I remain committed to contributing, however modestly, to the debate and related processes that will lead to a better and just Africa- where we all have equal opportunities. That keeps me sane despite my other everyday struggles!
It's Implementation Stupid- The Power to Follow Through
I have always wondered what makes individuals and institutions successful- not once off but consistently. So like any other good student of success I have read a number of books. Others have claimed the need for a certain kind leadership styles/skills/levels, others have raised the need for emotional intelligence, others the importance of setting good goals and targets. The list goes on. I have also faithfully followed up on the suggestions with regards to having a successful marriage, a balanced life, being a success at what you do etc. Others would suggest 7 Principles of this…others will talk about the character ethic etc- well and good and I think it’s necessary. But I have always felt inadequate had to read another book immediately afterwards- because I thought maybe foolishly that the answer is based on knowing and then developing the right formula. I was so wrong.
But last week something week- and my life and way of doing things has probably changed forever. It was during our board meeting- for those who work with non-profit boards will know how challenging boards made up of mostly volunteers can be. I was challenged at many levels, the frustrations (especially mine) were at times very audible, it was also adrenalin pumped, but there were moments when I had to dig deep into reservoirs of stamina dependent. A realization suddenly occurred to me that what matters at the end of the day after all the lofty discussions is following through the every decisions and idea and in the process making sure they are not abandoned –this is what I have decided to call ‘the power to follow through’. If I were Bill Clinton maybe I would say ‘it’s implementation-stupid’. A Christian friend of mine always says it’s about what you do on Monday- I suppose this refers to after hearing all the good preaching on Sunday.
Before I lose some of you- let me use examples from everyday life. Today is the 2nd of March- how many still remember their resolutions. I have noticed that most of the times we are not short of good ideas or goals but our struggle is in following through. Sadly this is where most of us fail.
The power to follow to through on ideas or decisions made is what separates those who end up successful and those who despite good intentions end up not succeeding in their different ventures. In the game of tennis one of the fundamentals of a good backhand is the ability to literally follow through. One does not just hit the ball but instead the motion of the hand should be one of guiding the ball even after hitting it- sort of directing its path. In football (a favorite for many) the most successful striker is the one who is always looking for loose balls- to follow-through. In innovation the most successful inventor- Thomas Edison made more than 1000 attempts at developing the light bulb literally learning from the previous mistake. Not giving up but learning and improvising-that is follow-through.
One the best books I have read is Slight Edge: Turning Simple Decisions into Massive Success’ by Jeff Olson. The author suggests very simple and easy to reach steps of achieving goals-for instance if one wants to improve their literary skills- all they need to read is 10 pages of a good book each day- at the end of the year one would have read 3 650 pages which could be more than 10 books. If one wants to lose weight- don’t go for the punishing schedule- you will give up too soon instead- but focus on starting by running just one kilometer each day- until you are comfortable with day. I could go on- but I am supposing you are getting the picture it’s about disciplined consistency.
Maybe to build another layer of thinking to this- let me make some suggestions on building great institutions. I have come to believe that institutions are not built and sustained just on good decisions or big visions alone but through the development of disciplined capacity to follow through on ideas/suggestions in a back-hand like manner in almost all facets of the institutions. Instructions, suggestions and orders can be made and at times even written down but adequate attention to follow-through carries the day and learning from mistakes. Ideas are delicate they need to be nurtured, recorded and also follow-through. In my short stint in leadership I have come to the realization that we are not short of a vision but the ability to follow-through even on those seemingly mundane discussions we would have held over lunch, at coffee break or even in a shared ride. The slight edge idea here would be to develop a habit of recording, develop action plans, deadlines and accountability structures- sounds mundane right but just check if you doing it. It’s not rocket science that will turn around an organisation but consistency of action and unity of purpose.
Great ideas that are not nurtured/incubated remain essentially prisoners without hope if we fail to create a vehicle to carry them forward. One of the biggest obstacles to follow through is the lack of appropriate record keeping processes or just the absence of the habit to write down things or also not caring enough about decisions. Some of us just make the mistake of assuming that they can remember everything in meetings and even in their quiet moments and never invest in jotting down. Ideas will come to those people and fly away without ever being implemented.
Since I assumed leadership at TrustAfrica I have been insisting that every member of the team send me a ‘3 things accomplished last week and 3 things you are doing this week’ list and this was partially based on this kind of thinking but today I realized that the 3 things is only a part of the arsenal. Our most brilliant moments tend to happen when we are so far away from the desks or even a pen and we just do not have the discipline to journal ideas, thoughts and suggestions. Somebody recently said that ‘the only thing that will carry forward TrustAfrica is the power of the idea’- I slightly disagree and instead put it this way ‘…the only thing that will take an organisation is the power of a well-executed idea’. I honestly do not think it’s the lack of good ideas currently crippling our continent but weak execution- ‘the power of follow through’
Many organisations including ours face two challenges; one of consistently archiving brilliant ideas and the second one on following through those good ideas. I will dwell on the latter a bit more. Organizations rise and fall based on their capacity to judiciously follow-through on the claims they make either in proposals, the values statement or broadly their strategies. These important documents are mostly used for fundraising documents and rarely internalized to be the guiding soul of the organisation and also to establish benchmarks of accountability. The crafting of any strategy presents an opportunity of developing consensus over an idea of what is special/unique about that organisation and also what is will do. Rarely do organizations feel challenged at the stage of writing these documents- the well-resourced one bring in consultants to help going them. The real test is always about follow-through on the idea contained within the strategy. The test is not about how good an idea it is but essentially about whether we can follow-through on the commitment we have made within the strategy through our daily small steps.
Our everyday work seemingly made up of mundane activities such as never ending meetings, reports here, and teleconference with so and so, lunch meeting etc lead to the big results. The challenge is in how we follow-through from these meetings to implement suggestions. On most occasions we tend to endure meetings and glad once its over- then we go to the ‘real work’-so sad!
I have come to the realization that the real answer to success in anything do is in implementing the few ideas that come my way and at times I will fail but that is also a fundamental part of success. My question to everyone is how can we make follow-through a part of our everyday work? Below I have made some suggestions;
- Keep a journal and a diary- record your own thoughts and interesting ideas from others
- Value time- start off the week/day with a modest list of things to do and people to talk
- Allow for disruptions but ensure you derive value from every interruption
- Work according to your own pace- do not be overwhelmed
- Create a follow-through chart- discussions held, decisions made and record outcomes after implementation
- Help others and share their success
- Keep tabs on decisions/ideas implemented
- Celebrate successful implementation
- In case of failure- evaluate why it failed- remember…at first you may not succeed but dust yourself and try again.
Falling in Love Again: Reconnecting with Purpose 1
Management Lessons from Everyday Life
On Being Complicit
Ndizvo Zviripo!
(This is what is there…we have to accept it)
The above words ‘…this is what is there’ or just ndizvo zviripo were used to help explain a very uncomfortable situation that we found ourselves in when we were visiting close family. The temperatures were very high, it was humid and also mosquitoes were having a feast on ‘new blood’. Our daughter was struggling, she could not sleep for more than two hours continuously, I was equally very uncomfortable and definitely the wisdom made a lot of sense…we were visiting and had to be polite to our hosts who were doing their best to make us comfortable. So, I had to live with the…ndizvo zviripo advice.
The advice made a lot of sense at that time as a tactic to cope with difficult circumstances and as long as you are in Africa there will be many other austere moments and all you can do is to suck it up and move on- especially for fellow travellers. However, there is a danger that this could turn out to be a more long-term posture of despair and accommodating what we can otherwise change. We can become used to mediocrity- most of the situations that we face are not natural conditions- take poverty for instance- no matter how dire it is man-made and does not need rocket science to address. Many other conditions and circumstances that we face are literally man-made (manufactured problems) we just a need a higher level of thinking to resolve them. The BIG challenge is us-we have come to a place where we do not care anymore and have literally become so used to the mess that we do not see how we can get out of it- very sad. At the point where we resign from being active agents of change to accepting what life throws at us, we have become a part of the problem- we are complicit.
Look around and see what you could have stood up against, but you let it be or you ranted a bit but eventually developed a coping mechanism. Let me give you an example- power cuts have become so common across Africa, even in Mzansi of all places- TIA (This is Africa)! Do you remember way back at the turn of the century when we started to feel the pinch of power cuts here in Zimbabwe- remember the blackouts and 12-hour outages- there was so much rage and all sorts of threats calling for leaders to be more accountable and the state more responsive etc…but what has happened since then. Things have become worse, it’s not only power that is in short supply even water but and here is the contradiction we seem to have accepted an abnormality. We have instead re-organized ourselves around an apparent collapse of the state- through generators, inverters and others are even contemplating getting off the power grid completely. Seems like a sure clever way of addressing what looks like a problem that is going nowhere. But in it are we not being complicit to the failure of the state to provide essential services. In areas where we were supposed to create sufficient pressure for improved services, we are letting the state off the hook.
I could go on about how the middle class (those who have some little money) has without intending to do so become complicit in perpetuating ineffective local and national government regimes. Take water supply for instance- have you seen how the middle class has installed boreholes to an extent that we actually face a threat to underground water supplies. Those who cannot afford boreholes have supported the emergence of new water merchants- who would have thought that people could make money from selling water- privatization of public goods! How about education? Same story- there are more elite private schools registered in the post 2000 period –thanks to the collapse of the public school system. So why do we still need a government if we can take care of all these needs?
We are not investing in making the state responsive but instead we are taking matters into our own hands- others call it agency- that is well and good. But at some point tax dollars and being in public office should mean something- accountability and effectiveness. Not all of us can afford to recreate what should be public goods on our own.
We are complicit in the rot that we are currently going through as a nation, instead of confronting mediocrity we disengage and create our own little bubbles/islands of comfort. Very sad. It is easy to crack jokes/gossip about government’s failure and the insatiable greed of political leaders and other office holders instead of openly confronting the injustices they perpetrate- we are all complicit. Here is what James Allen in his classic book. As a Man Thinketh, written over one hundred years ago had to say:
“It has been usual for men to think and to say, many men are slaves because one is an oppressor, let us hate the oppressor. Now, however, there is among an increasing few a tendency to reverse this judgement, and to say that one man is an oppressor because many are slaves; let us despise the slaves. The truth is that the oppressor and the slave are cooperators in ignorance, and while seeming to afflict each other, are in reality afflicting themselves”.
So, we are all responsible- instead of blaming just one man. I will not even write about those amongst us who have entertained thoughts of joining the political bandwagon as a strategy to be part of the inner circle. I doubt if democracy can ever work without citizens engaged in a continuous process of what I call ‘humbling power’ through demands for accountability, effectiveness and justice. May I conclude by quoting Malawian Author Chiku Malunga.
“Fear is a key obstacle to surmount. The great tragedy in Africa today is not the powerlessness of the grassroots but the silence of the enlightened and educated people who are paralyzed by fear”.
I appreciate that many of us are afraid, and you have your reasons for being afraid but please don’t convert into praise singing of what is blatantly unjust. We have to be careful about the legacy we will pass onto those coming after us-history has a way of not creating neat divisions between the rulers and the ruled but will only talk about what happened to Zimbabwe after the turn of the century and guess what, just by the coincidence of us being alive during this period we are complicit in the ruin.